Please read and accept the terms and conditions and check the box to generate a sharing link. Research off-campus without worrying about access issues.
Similar books and articles
Find out about Lean Library here. Skip to main content. History of Science. Article Menu. Download PDF.
Find a copy online
Cite Citation Tools. How to cite this article If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Download Citation If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Share Share. Recommend to a friend. Sharing links are not available for this article. I have read and accept the terms and conditions. Copy to clipboard.
Request Permissions View permissions information for this article. Galileo's Construction of Idealized Fall in the Void. Article information. Article Information Volume: 43 issue: 4, page s : Paolo Palmieri University of Pittsburgh. First Page. Sign Out. Email required Password required Remember me Forgotten your password? Need to activate? Institutional Access does not have access to this content. Open Athens. Purchase Content 24 hours online access to download content.
Subscribe to this journal. Recommend to your library. Rent with DeepDyve. Rent Article. Your Access Options. Forgotten your password? Article available in:.
Vol 43, Issue 4, Galileo's System of Patronage. The Telescope before Galileo.
Essays on Galileo and the History and Philosophy of Science : Volume 3.
Journal for the History of Astronomy. Galileo and Satellite Prediction.
Galluzzi, Paolo , Momento: Studi galileiani Rome , , — Ronald Naylor claims that in experiments aimed at studying the motion of projectiles Galileo found results conflicting with the sameness of ratios hypothesized in ; cf.
Damerow et al. Wisan's view, the discovery was based on a crucial experiment concerning projection, documented in Galilei —38, folio verso. All things considered I believe that these interpretations of single folios of Manuscript 72 , though interesting, raise mostly unresolvable questions since they are based on reconstructions which are so underdetermined that a verdict cannot be reached. Finally, cf.
- essay spm advantage and disadvantages of computer?
- essays on beauty and the beast.
- order cheap essay online?
Sylla, E. Thesis, London University , , 43 — 45 , for a criticism of Sylla's argument.
Galileo’s reputation is more hyperbole than truth | Aeon Ideas
Galilei — , ii, —6. The editor of the National Edition of Galileo's works, Antonio Favaro Galilei —, ii, —60 , believed it to have been written about , in connection with the letter to Sarpi. For the date and the internal chronology of De motu antiquiora, cf. Drabkin, I. Thesis, Indiana University , , 62 — ; Camerota, M. The only exception to the early date is Carugo, A. Palmieri, P. Mental models are mental representations analogical with the states of affairs they are intended to represent. For a general treatment of the various aspects of the Euclidean theory of samenesses of ratios, I have relied on: Grattan-Guinness, I.
Rose, P. Bernard Cohen Cambridge , , 11 — Giusti, E. The Postils to Rocco is a set of comments and notes that Galileo wrote in response to a book published in by an Aristotelian philosopher, Antonio Rocco, and attacking the Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems published by Galileo the year before. The Postils to Rocco has been published in Galilei —, vii, — On Rocco, cf. Favaro, Antonio, Rocco, A. Galilei — , i, In general, on the possible influence on Galileo of Francesco Buonamici, a professor at Pisa in the s, cf.
Helbing has studied in detail Buonamici's natural philosophy and concluded that there seems to be some affinity between the two authors' philosophical attitudes towards mathematics; cf. Camerota and Helbing also claim that Galileo's view on Archimedean extrusion another vague expression that the paper's authors never clarify was influenced by Girolamo Borri, and exactly the opposite of Buonamici's.
For a radically different analysis of Galileo's views on Archimedean buoyancy in De motu antiquiora , which were firmly grounded in Archimedes's mathematical treatment of floating bodies, cf.